Jones v. Root
72 Mass. 435
Opinion
We are of opinion that § 13 of St. 1855, c. 215, which authorizes the seizure of liquors, is not unconstitutional; that the law was in all respects correctly stated to the jury; that the verdict has established the facts which, by the law, constituted" a defence to the action; and that the illustration used by the judge in his remarks to the jury, which is excepted tr by the plaintiff, is not a legal ground of exception.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Root, 72 Mass. 435 (Mass. 1856).
72 Mass. 435 (Jones v. Root) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atwater v. City of Lago Vista
532 U.S. 318 (Supreme Court, 2001)
Watson v. State
189 N.W. 620 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1922)
Folson v. Piper
192 Iowa 1056 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)
Rose v. State
87 N.E. 103 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)