Jones v. Rodman

4 Blackf. 492, 1838 Ind. LEXIS 56
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 30, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Blackf. 492 (Jones v. Rodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Rodman, 4 Blackf. 492, 1838 Ind. LEXIS 56 (Ind. 1838).

Opinion

TWO days after the rendition of a judgment by a justice in favour of the plaintiff, the defendant obtained a new trial. On the day fixed for the new trial, the parties appeared, and the plaintiff obtained a continuance on account of the absence of witnesses whom he had subpoenaed, making no objection to the previous proceedings. On the day to which the cause was continued, the parties appeared and the cause was tried, the previous proceedings not being objected to. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed. Held, that the plaintiff’s affidavit that the justice’s first judgment was rendered in the plaintiff’s absence, and that the new trial [493]*493was applied for and granted without his knowledge, was not a sufficient ground, under the circumstances, for dismissing appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Erskine v. Onyett
11 Ind. 335 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Blackf. 492, 1838 Ind. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-rodman-ind-1838.