Jones v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jones v. Roberts

43 A. 123, 191 Pa. 152, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 794

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 24, 1899

DocketAppeal, No. 88

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 A. 123 (Jones v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Roberts, 43 A. 123, 191 Pa. 152, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 794 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There was evidence enough in the testimony of the plaintiff to carry the case to the jury on the question of waiver of notice oí protest. The court correctly left this question to the jury and they found in favor of the plaintiff. We do not see how they could have found otherwise. The case of Reiff v. McMiller, 45 Legal Int. 26, cited by appellant, has no application. It does not raise the question at issue here.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

There was evidence enough in the testimony of the plaintiff to carry the case to the jury on the question of waiver of notice oí protest. The court correctly left this question to the jury and they found in favor of the plaintiff. We do not see how they could have found otherwise. The case of Reiff v. McMiller, 45 Legal Int. 26, cited by appellant, has no application. It does not raise the question at issue here.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A. 123, 191 Pa. 152, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-roberts-pa-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack