Jones v. Roberts

43 A. 123, 191 Pa. 152, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 794
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 24, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 88·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There was evidence enough in the testimony of the plaintiff to carry the case to the jury on the question of waiver of notice oí protest. The court correctly left this question to the jury and they found in favor of the plaintiff. We do not see how they could have found otherwise. The case of Reiff v. McMiller, 45 Legal Int. 26, cited by appellant, has no application. It does not raise the question at issue here.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Roberts, 43 A. 123, 191 Pa. 152, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 794 (Pa. 1899).

43 A. 123 (Jones v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Nat. Bk. of Granville v. Delone
167 A. 286 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)