Jones v. Ringold
This text of 1 Yeates 480 (Jones v. Ringold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Indebitatus assumpsit. Pleas, non assumpsit and payment.
It appeared that the plaintiff had boarded and lodged the defendant and his family for some time; and a dispute arising about some of the items of the account, it was submitted to arbitrators by parol, who struck off nl. from the plaintiff’s claim, and awarded 55I. is. 4d. to be paid by the defendant.
The court informed the jury, that they should give a verdict for that sum and interest from the time of the award. It was equivalent to a (Vid. 3 Wils. 206. 2 Vez. 365) settled account between the parties.
Verdict for the plaintiff for 58b 7s. 4d. damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Yeates 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-ringold-pa-1795.