Jones v. Ringold

1 Yeates 480
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1795·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Indebitatus assumpsit. Pleas, non assumpsit and payment.

It appeared that the plaintiff had boarded and lodged the defendant and his family for some time; and a dispute arising about some of the items of the account, it was submitted to arbitrators by parol, who struck off nl. from the plaintiff’s claim, and awarded 55I. is. 4d. to be paid by the defendant.

The court informed the jury, that they should give a verdict for that sum and interest from the time of the award. It was equivalent to a (Vid. 3 Wils. 206. 2 Vez. 365) settled account between the parties.

Verdict for the plaintiff for 58b 7s. 4d. damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Ringold, 1 Yeates 480 (Pa. 1795).

1 Yeates 480 (Jones v. Ringold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weldon & Kelly Co. v. Pavia Co.
46 A.2d 466 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Lackawanna Iron & Steel Co. v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley R. R.
149 A. 702 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)