Jones v. Riggs

301 F. App'x 211
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 2008
DocketNo. 08-8093
StatusPublished

This text of 301 F. App'x 211 (Jones v. Riggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Riggs, 301 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Riccardo Darnell Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district [212]*212court. Jones v. Riggs, No. 5:08-cv-00092-GCM, 2008 WL 3823693 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2008). We deny Jones’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-riggs-ca4-2008.