Jones v. Rauschenberg
97 S.E. 862, 23 Ga. App. 276, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 86
This text of 97 S.E. 862 (Jones v. Rauschenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. Rauschenberg, 97 S.E. 862, 23 Ga. App. 276, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 86 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinions
It was not error to strike the defendant’s answer as amended, and the judge of the superior court did not -err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 862, 23 Ga. App. 276, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-rauschenberg-gactapp-1919.