Jones v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Jones v. Randolph

1947 OK 190, 182 P.2d 522, 198 Okla. 677, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 564

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 17, 1947

DocketNo. 33111

StatusPublished

This text of 1947 OK 190 (Jones v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Randolph, 1947 OK 190, 182 P.2d 522, 198 Okla. 677, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 564 (Okla. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver. The appeal is by petition in error with transcript attached.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the alleged error in refusing to vacate the order appointing the receiver cannot be presented by transcript. The appeal must be dismissed. In First National Bank of McAlester v. McIntosh, 113 Okla. 15, 237 P. 460, we held:

“An order on a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver is not a part of the record proper, and cannot be reviewed by this court on petition in error and transcript.”

See, also, Security State Bank v. Malone, 129 Okla. 112, 263 P. 655.

Appeal dismissed.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI