Jones v. Ramsdell
173 A.D. 999
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1916
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished
This text of 173 A.D. 999 (Jones v. Ramsdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. Ramsdell, 173 A.D. 999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
— The motion to strike from the files of this court respondents’ brief is denied. Appellant’s criticism is limited to the improper incorporation in such brief of certain matter not used upon the motion at Special Term. As to such part thereof the brief will be disregarded. Ho costs are aRowed on this motion. AR concurred; Lambert, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-ramsdell-nyappdiv-1916.