Jones v. Ralston

Ohio Supreme Court

Jones v. Ralston

158 N.E. 85, 116 Ohio St. 734, 116 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 347

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 29, 1927

Docket20242

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 158 N.E. 85 (Jones v. Ralston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Ralston, 158 N.E. 85, 116 Ohio St. 734, 116 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 347 (Ohio 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause was admitted to this court on motion to certify the record. Later a motion was made by the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error on the ground that no bill of exceptions had been allowed and that the assignments of error were not properly presented by the pleadings and the journal entries. Thereafter upon motion of plaintiff in error a continuance was granted to permit a further application in the Court of Appeals to incorporate the findings of fact in the journal entry of that court. The Court of Appeals denied the relief sought. The cause therefore stands in this court without sufficient record to present the assignments of error set forth in the petition in error. The motion to dismiss the petition in error will therefore be sustained.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Bat, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause was admitted to this court on motion to certify the record. Later a motion was made by the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error on the ground that no bill of exceptions had been allowed and that the assignments of error were not properly presented by the pleadings and the journal entries. Thereafter upon motion of plaintiff in error a continuance was granted to permit a further application in the Court of Appeals to incorporate the findings of fact in the journal entry of that court. The Court of Appeals denied the relief sought. The cause therefore stands in this court without sufficient record to present the assignments of error set forth in the petition in error. The motion to dismiss the petition in error will therefore be sustained.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Bat, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 N.E. 85, 116 Ohio St. 734, 116 Ohio St. (N.S.) 734, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-ralston-ohio-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack