Jones v. Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

263 A.D. 967, 33 N.Y.S.2d 192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 A.D. 725

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted and reargument set down for Wednesday, March 4, 1942. [See ante, p. 898; post, p.-.] Section 102 of the Tenement House Law is not applicable. On the reargument, attention may be directed to the following: (a) Was the painting done by the landlord in April, 1938, a proximate cause of the accident; (b) did the landlord have control of the building, in so far as the painting of the exterior of the casement [968]*968window was concerned; (e) if (b) should be answered in the negative, the liability of the landlord, having particular reference to the rule stated in Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Adv. Co. (258 N. Y. 489). Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 263 A.D. 967, 33 N.Y.S.2d 192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

263 A.D. 967 (Jones v. Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.
180 N.E. 245 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)