Jones v. Quaker City Cab Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Jones v. Quaker City Cab Co.

84 Pa. Super. 80, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 219

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 17, 1924

DocketAppeal, 106

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 Pa. Super. 80 (Jones v. Quaker City Cab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Quaker City Cab Co., 84 Pa. Super. 80, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 219 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The only complaint is that the court below refused a new trial. At the oral argument in this court, counsel for appellant frankly stated that he was unable to show *83 any abuse of discretion, contending, however, that this conrt should examine the evidence de novo; the rule is otherwise; his concession leaves nothing for our consideration; if the only complaint is that the court refused a new trial, this court will not interfere unless abuse of discretion is shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The only complaint is that the court below refused a new trial. At the oral argument in this court, counsel for appellant frankly stated that he was unable to show *83 any abuse of discretion, contending, however, that this conrt should examine the evidence de novo; the rule is otherwise; his concession leaves nothing for our consideration; if the only complaint is that the court refused a new trial, this court will not interfere unless abuse of discretion is shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 Pa. Super. 80, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-quaker-city-cab-co-pasuperct-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack