Home/Third Circuit/Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance

Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance

192 F.2d 1018
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1951
DocketNos. 10459, 10462
StatusPublished

This text of 192 F.2d 1018 (Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance, 192 F.2d 1018 (3d Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions presented by the instant appeals are really those of fact. The fact findings made by the court below find full support in the evidence. Consideration of the record, the briefs and of the oral argument convinces us that the court below did not commit error. Accordingly the judgments appealed from will be affirmed. 93 F.Supp. 505, in which motion denied 95 F.Supp. 589.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins.
93 F. Supp. 505 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
Jones v. Protection Mut. Fire Ins. of Cambria
95 F. Supp. 589 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 F.2d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-protection-mutual-fire-insurance-ca3-1951.