Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance
192 F.2d 1018
Opinion
The questions presented by the instant appeals are really those of fact. The fact findings made by the court below find full support in the evidence. Consideration of the record, the briefs and of the oral argument convinces us that the court below did not commit error. Accordingly the judgments appealed from will be affirmed. 93 F.Supp. 505, in which motion denied 95 F.Supp. 589.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance, 192 F.2d 1018 (3d Cir. 1951).
192 F.2d 1018 (Jones v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins.
93 F. Supp. 505 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
Jones v. Protection Mut. Fire Ins. of Cambria
95 F. Supp. 589 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1951)