Jones v. Primrose Dry Cleaning Co.

181 S.E. 577, 181 Ga. 103, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 34
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 20, 1935·No. No. 10582·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

The exception is to an interlocutory judgment enjoining an employee and his confederate from carrying on a competitive business after" termination of the employment for a limited time in defined territory, in violation of the contract of employment. The suit was instituted by an assignee of the contract which did not expressly state that the restrictive agreement was enforceable by an assignee. On application of the principles ruled in National Linen Service Corporation v. Clower, 179 Ga. 136 (175 S. E. 460), to the pleadings and evidence, the court did not err in upholding the contract, and, on conflicting evidence, granting the injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Primrose Dry Cleaning Co., 181 S.E. 577, 181 Ga. 103, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 34 (Ga. 1935).

181 S.E. 577 (Jones v. Primrose Dry Cleaning Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Stidham
506 F. Supp. 1182 (M.D. Georgia, 1981)
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Williams
332 F. Supp. 923 (N.D. Georgia, 1971)
Kirshbaum v. Jones
56 S.E.2d 484 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Ogle v. Wright
2 S.E.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)