Jones v. Powell

15 Ky. 289, 5 Litt. 289, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 86
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 2, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Ky. 289 (Jones v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Powell, 15 Ky. 289, 5 Litt. 289, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 86 (Ky. Ct. App. 1824).

Opinion

[289]*289Opinion of the Court,

by Judge Owsley.

Although the replevin bond, which was taken to Lazarus Powell, may have been assigned by him, it [290]*290was correct to issue the execution thereon in his name; but ^ was irregular f°r th® sheriff to take the bond for the delivery of the property seized under the execution, to Henderson Powell, though by an endorsement of the c^er^ upon the execution, he appears to be the assignee of the replevin bond, and beneficially interested in the execution.

wag therefore correct, on the application of Lázarus Powell, not only to quash the bond taken by the sheriff for the delivery of the property on the day of ga]C) |Jut to enable him to sue out another execution upon ^le replevin bond, it was also cori’ect to quash the execution which had issued and was returned by the sheriff.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. McKnight-keaton Grocery Co.
21 S.W.2d 269 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Ky. 289, 5 Litt. 289, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-powell-kyctapp-1824.