Jones v. Porter

59 Miss. 628
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 59 Miss. 628 (Jones v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Porter, 59 Miss. 628 (Mich. 1882).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The deed of trust was void, because it was executed by the appellee without the joinder of her husband ; and the absolute conveyance to Jane Jones was void, because the acknowledgment of the appellee was taken by the husband of the grantee, who was the pro^cjiring cause of its being made to her. Wasson v. Connor, 54 Miss. 351. The decree cancelling these deeds was correct.

The objection made by the appellants to that part of the decree which directs the clerk to enter the fact of cancellation on the margin of the record is unavailing to them. Such entry will in no way harm them, and may be very useful hereafter in pointing those who search the records, and see these deeds there, to an important part of their history, which might otherwise escape the observation of those interested to ascertain it. It is useful to the public, and harmless to the appellants, that such notation should be made on the record of the deeds. Decree affirmed„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morton v. Resolution Trust Corp.
918 F. Supp. 985 (S.D. Mississippi, 1995)
Thames v. Jackson Production Credit Ass'n
600 So. 2d 208 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. United States
132 A. 138 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1926)
State v. U. S. Realty Improvement Co.
132 A. 138 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1926)
Bartlett v. Bolte
193 Iowa 1063 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)
Vanderbilt v. Mitchell
67 A. 97 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1907)
Kothe v. Krag-Reynolds Co.
50 N.E. 594 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Horbach v. Tyrrell
37 L.R.A. 434 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Holden v. Brimage
18 So. 383 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1894)
Penn v. Garvin
20 S.W. 410 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Miss. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-porter-miss-1882.