Jones v. Poinsett County Housing Authority
This text of Jones v. Poinsett County Housing Authority (Jones v. Poinsett County Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
BARBARA JONES PLAINTIFF
No. 3:20-cv-37-DPM
POINSETT COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY DEFENDANT
ORDER 1. Jones’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Ne 1, is granted. She can’t afford the filing fee. 2. The Court must screen her complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Jones worked for the Housing Authority for about eight months. She did maintenance at its low-income housing units. She says the Housing Authority never disciplined her in writing or said she wasn’t doing her job well, and the executive director called her a good worker. She and her coworkers had to wear Housing Authority t-shirts; otherwise, Jones says, employees could wear whatever they wanted. She wore baseball caps, boots, and hairstyles that she says her supervisors associated with men’s fashion. Her supervisors and the executive director—all men—told her they didn’t like the way she dressed, and they directed her to wear clothes appropriate for women. She says that because of her appearance, her work duties were restricted to cleaning; she was asked not to work one day; and her
supervisor threatened to fire her if she didn’t dress more like a woman. When she refused, her supervisor handed her a termination letter, which said she wasn’t a good fit for the maintenance team. Jones has therefore plausibly pleaded sex discrimination and a hostile work environment in violation of federal law. Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, L.L.C., 591 F.3d 1033, 1038-39 (8th Cir. 2010). And the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over her state claim, which directly relates to her federal claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). 3. Jones’s lawyers must prepare a summons, which the Clerk will issue, for Poinsett County Housing Authority. Counsel must deliver process to the U.S. Marshal for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The Court directs the Marshal to serve the summons and complaint without prepayment of fees. So Ordered. OPrn4. sta D.P. Marsinali jr. United States District Judge __ eehnvmy A020
a7
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones v. Poinsett County Housing Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-poinsett-county-housing-authority-ared-2020.