Jones v. Platt

New York Supreme Court

Jones v. Platt

60 How. Pr. 277

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 How. Pr. 277 (Jones v. Platt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Platt, 60 How. Pr. 277 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Merlin, J.

In order to fairly comply with the order of Septemer 27, 1880, the plaintiff should, I think, either strike ot the last clause of the bill served—the clause com[280]*280mencing, “ Said defendant did as plaintiff is informed and believes at other places and dates and times,” &e.— or he should state the times and places with more particularity.

An order may be entered requiring a further bill to be served which shall strike out that clause or give the particular times and places. Costs of motion to defendant' to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merlin, J.

In order to fairly comply with the order of Septemer 27, 1880, the plaintiff should, I think, either strike ot the last clause of the bill served—the clause com[280]*280mencing, “ Said defendant did as plaintiff is informed and believes at other places and dates and times,” &e.— or he should state the times and places with more particularity.

An order may be entered requiring a further bill to be served which shall strike out that clause or give the particular times and places. Costs of motion to defendant' to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 How. Pr. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-platt-nysupct-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack