Jones v. Pillow
This text of 11 F. App'x 686 (Jones v. Pillow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Arkansas inmate William Jones appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of sum[687]*687mary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference. Because our de novo review of the summary judgment record confirms that the undisputed evidence shows appellees did not disregard Jones’s serious medical need, or delay or deny him access to medical care, Jones’s deliberate-indifference claims fail. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 107, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Long v. Nix, 86 F.3d 761, 765 (8th Cir.1996); Bellecourt v. United States, 994 F.2d 427, 431 (8th Cir.1993), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1109 1994, 114 S.Ct. 1049, 127 L.Ed.2d 371. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. App'x 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-pillow-ca8-2001.