Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 166 F.2d 299 (Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Careful examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral arguments in the appeal at bar convince us that the court below did not commit reversible error in the admission or introduction of testimony or in its instructions to the jury. We conclude therefore that the judgment of the court below, 75 F.Supp. 855, must be affirmed. An order will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F.2d 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ca3-1948.