Jones v. Pat Tucci & Bros.

Supreme Court of Florida

Jones v. Pat Tucci & Bros.

165 So. 2d 755, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2812

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1964

DocketNo. 33382

StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 2d 755 (Jones v. Pat Tucci & Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Pat Tucci & Bros., 165 So. 2d 755, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2812 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[756]*756pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[756]*756pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 So. 2d 755, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-pat-tucci-bros-fla-1964.