Jones v. O'Malley
This text of Jones v. O'Malley (Jones v. O'Malley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________
JEWELL JONES,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:24-cv-01002-STA-atc
MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING SENTENCE FOUR REMAND ______________________________________________________________________________
The Commissioner of Social Security has moved the Court to reverse the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and remand this action to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (ECF Doc. No. 11). The Commissioner, after reviewing the Certified Administrative Record, requests remand to allow the ALJ to properly consider the medical opinion evidence pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520c and 416.920c. Without opposition, the motion is GRANTED. Remand will expedite administrative review, ensure that the Commissioner has the opportunity to fully consider Plaintiff’s claim, and may ultimately make judicial review unnecessary. Remand by this Court is appropriate under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which provides: The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.
See, also, Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Newkirk v. Shalala, 25 F.3d 316, 318 (6th Cir. 1994). For the foregoing reasons and pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in this matter pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure reversing the decision of the ALJ and remanding this case to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ S. Thomas Anderson S. THOMAS ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: February 13, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones v. O'Malley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-omalley-tnwd-2024.