Jones v. O'Connor
97 A. 466, 252 Pa. 311, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 612
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 21, 1916
DocketMiscellaneous Docket, No. 3
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 97 A. 466 (Jones v. O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. O'Connor, 97 A. 466, 252 Pa. 311, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 612 (Pa. 1916).
Opinion
In the absence of an express or implied agreement by counsel to the contrary, in every instance, all rules must be made returnable at the county seat. Let the mandamus issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bar Ass'n v. Lukacs
42 Pa. D. & C. 619 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1941)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. Pommer
199 A. 485 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Commonwealth v. Trinkle
124 A. 191 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 A. 466, 252 Pa. 311, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-oconnor-pa-1916.