Jones v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.

778 N.E.2d 1051, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1460
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 2002
Docket2002-1324
StatusPublished

This text of 778 N.E.2d 1051 (Jones v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 778 N.E.2d 1051, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-01-1490, 2002-0hio-3412. On discretionary appeal, motion for admission pro hac vice of Robert W. Schmieder by E.J. Leizerman, and motion for admission pro hac vice of Christie R. Schmieder by E.J. Leizerman. Appeal allowed and motions granted.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
778 N.E.2d 1051, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-norfolk-s-ry-co-ohio-2002.