Jones v. Nicholson

236 F. App'x 607
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 2007
Docket2006-7307
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 F. App'x 607 (Jones v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Nicholson, 236 F. App'x 607 (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Opinion

LINN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Bobby R. Jones moves without opposition to vacate the final judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in Jones v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 97 (Vet.App.2006), and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Barrett v. Nicholson, 466 F.3d 1038 (Fed.Cir.2006).

Jones filed an untimely appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. The court dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction, stating that he failed to establish entitlement to equitable tolling of the 120-day period. The court rejected Jones’ argument that the Secretary had a duty to assist him in developing evidence relevant to the issue of equitable tolling.

In Barrett, this court held that when a veteran alleges facts to show entitlement to equitable tolling, and jurisdiction is called into question, the government must assist the court by providing and, where necessary, procuring further evidence helpful in deciding jurisdiction. Barrett, 466 F.3d at 1044.

Because the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims rejected the assistance endorsed by this court in Barrett, we vacate the court’s judgment and remand the case for reconsideration in light of Barrett.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

*608 (1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bobby R. Jones v. James B. Peake
22 Vet. App. 247 (Veterans Claims, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 F. App'x 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-nicholson-cafc-2007.