Jones v. New York City Transit Authority
228 A.D.2d 317, 644 N.Y.2d 617, 644 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7224
Opinion
Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the evidence adduced at trial affects our prior determination (183 AD2d 658) that, under the particular facts of this case, there existed a special relationship between defendant municipality and [318] plaintiff creating a duty on the part of the former to provide police protection to the latter. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. New York City Transit Authority, 228 A.D.2d 317, 644 N.Y.2d 617, 644 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 317 (Jones v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. New York City Transit Authority
183 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)