Jones v. New York City Transit Authority

Second Circuit

Jones v. New York City Transit Authority

111 F. App'x 644

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 5, 2004

DocketNo. 03-9137

StatusPublished

This text of 111 F. App'x 644 (Jones v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. New York City Transit Authority, 111 F. App'x 644 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Denise Jones appeals pro se from the District Court’s judgment entered September 29, 2003, dismissing her complaint against defendant and granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Since Jones filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, she has waived her right to appellate review. See, e.g., Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.1993).

In any event, Jones’s suit was properly dismissed as time-barred and for failure to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.

jjc ifc jfc ifc 'Jf,

We have considered all of plaintiffs arguments and have found each of them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI