Jones v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

8 A.3d 311, 607 Pa. 480, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2639
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 17, 2010
Docket328 EAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 A.3d 311 (Jones v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 8 A.3d 311, 607 Pa. 480, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2639 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of November 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Does Pennsylvania law require that a party suffering damages be made whole before an insurer is entitled to subrogation?

(2) Does the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner have the authority to promulgate a regulation regarding allocation of subrogation proceeds between an insurance company and its insured following subrogation recovery?

(3) Is the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner’s regulation allowing insurers to allocate subrogation proceeds on a pro rata basis void because it violates Pennsylvania substantive common law, the “made whole” doctrine?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance
32 A.3d 1261 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.3d 311, 607 Pa. 480, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-nationwide-property-and-casualty-insurance-company-pa-2010.