Jones v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

8 A.3d 311, 607 Pa. 480, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2639
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 17, 2010·No. 328 EAL 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of November 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Does Pennsylvania law require that a party suffering damages be made whole before an insurer is entitled to subrogation?

(2) Does the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner have the authority to promulgate a regulation regarding allocation of subrogation proceeds between an insurance company and its insured following subrogation recovery?

(3) Is the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner’s regulation allowing insurers to allocate subrogation proceeds on a pro rata basis void because it violates Pennsylvania substantive common law, the “made whole” doctrine?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 8 A.3d 311, 607 Pa. 480, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2639 (Pa. 2010).

8 A.3d 311 (Jones v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance
32 A.3d 1261 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)