Jones v. Muse

3 S.C.L. 67
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 15, 1802·Published

Opinions

The judges delivered their opinions as follows.:

Trezevant, J.

I am of opinion, that the plea in abatement should be overruled, because the verdict in the case of Fort v. Jones, did not vest the property.in Fort; but. Jones, upon paying the damages, which it was in his option to do, had a right to keep th,e slave. And, besides, while the motion for a new tria.l was pending [69]*69in this court, the event of the suit of Fort v. Jones, was still uncertain, inasmuch as a new trial might have been granted; and if granted, of course Fort would have taken nothing under his verdict in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Muse, 3 S.C.L. 67 (S.C. 1802).

3 S.C.L. 67 (Jones v. Muse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.