Jones v. Morristown Aqueduct Co.
37 N.J.L. 556
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (7 Vroom 206.)
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Knapp, Woodhull, Clement, Dodd, Green, Lilly, Wales. 8.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Morristown Aqueduct Co., 37 N.J.L. 556 (N.J. 1875).
37 N.J.L. 556 (Jones v. Morristown Aqueduct Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saij Realty Inc. v. Town of Kearny
8 N.J. Tax 191 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1986)
Union Terminal Cold Storage Co. v. Spence
110 A.2d 110 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
In Re NY Central Railroad System
102 A.2d 770 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)