Jones v. MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

269 S.W.3d 468, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1317, 2008 WL 4388696

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. WD 69322·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tom Jones appeals from the circuit court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission upholding his termination from the Missouri Department of Transportation. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tom Jones appeals from the circuit court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission upholding his termination from the Missouri Department of Transportation. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Jones v. MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, 269 S.W.3d 468, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1317, 2008 WL 4388696 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

269 S.W.3d 468 (Jones v. MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.