Jones v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jones v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

245 A.D.2d 265, 666 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12094

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 265 (Jones v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 245 A.D.2d 265, 666 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated March 10, 1997, which granted the motion of the defendant Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Because the plaintiff commenced the instant action more than one year and 30 days after her cause of action accrued, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the action was time-barred (see, Public Authorities Law § 1276 [2]; Burgess v Long Is. R. R. Auth., 79 NY2d 777). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated March 10, 1997, which granted the motion of the defendant Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Because the plaintiff commenced the instant action more than one year and 30 days after her cause of action accrued, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the action was time-barred (see, Public Authorities Law § 1276 [2]; Burgess v Long Is. R. R. Auth., 79 NY2d 777). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 265, 666 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-metropolitan-suburban-bus-authority-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack