Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMay 2, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co., 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should De modified by requiring the plaintiffs, at the time of the delivery of their deed as in said judgment, provided, to also deliver to the defendants a release of the property duly executed by the mortgagee of the promises mentioned in the thirty-ninth finding of fact, and as thus modified it should he affirmed, without costs to ei her party on this appeal.

Sedgwick, Ch. J.. Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment should De modified by requiring the plaintiffs, at the time of the delivery of their deed as in said judgment, provided, to also deliver to the defendants a release of the property duly executed by the mortgagee of the promises mentioned in the thirty-ninth finding of fact, and as thus modified it should he affirmed, without costs to ei her party on this appeal.

Sedgwick, Ch. J.. Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-metropolitan-el-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.