Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 2, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should De modified by requiring the plaintiffs, at the time of the delivery of their deed as in said judgment, provided, to also deliver to the defendants a release of the property duly executed by the mortgagee of the promises mentioned in the thirty-ninth finding of fact, and as thus modified it should he affirmed, without costs to ei her party on this appeal.

Sedgwick, Ch. J.. Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment should De modified by requiring the plaintiffs, at the time of the delivery of their deed as in said judgment, provided, to also deliver to the defendants a release of the property duly executed by the mortgagee of the promises mentioned in the thirty-ninth finding of fact, and as thus modified it should he affirmed, without costs to ei her party on this appeal.

Sedgwick, Ch. J.. Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co., 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.