Jones v. Meade
This text of 510 F.2d 961 (Jones v. Meade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
510 F.2d 961
Application of William JONES et al., Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
Robert C. MEADE et al., First Respondents-Appellees,
Hector H. Gayle, Executive Director, et al., Second
Respondents-Appellees,
John Maylott and Gerald B. Cruise, Department, of Housing
and Urban Development, Third Respondents-Appellees.
No. 528, Docket 74--2030.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 9, 1975.
Decided Feb. 10, 1975.
Robert Rivers, Westbury, N.Y., for petitioners-appellants.
Richard J. Osterndorf, Mineola, N.Y., for first respondents-appellees.
Ralph A. Nappi, Port Washington, N.Y., for second respondents-appellees.
Harold J. Friedman, Asst. U.S. Atty. (David G. Trager, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Paul B. Bergman, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for third respondents-appellees. BJ Before SMITH, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge John R. Bartels' opinion, 378 F.Supp. 286 (E.D.N.Y.1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 F.2d 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-meade-ca1-1975.