Jones v. McMillan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jones v. McMillan

100 S.E. 226, 24 Ga. App. 186, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 489

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 19, 1919

Docket10134

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 226 (Jones v. McMillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. McMillan, 100 S.E. 226, 24 Ga. App. 186, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 489 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the hill of exceptions, upon the ground that the assignments of error therein are not properly made, is without merit, and is therefore denied.

2. The plea of the defendant as amended set forth no legal defense to the plaintiff’s suit, and the court erred in not sustaining the demurrer interposed, and in not striking the entire plea.

3. Tlie error in the ruling upon the demurrer rendered the further proceedings nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. J. 0. Edwards & Sons, for plaintiffs,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4290, 5660, 5775; 100 Ga. 439, 141; 97 Ga. 775; 16 Ga. App. 385; 16 Ga. App. 262; 15 Ga. App. 719 (5); 111 Ga. 143; 89 Ga. [188]*188602; 108 Ga. 140, 141; 108 Ga. 494; 4 Ga. App. 775; 140 Ga. 321 (2).

McMillan & Erwin, for defendant,

cited: 101 Ga. 296; 132 Get. 630; 109 Ga. 255; 114 Ga. 627; 135 Ga. 544.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI