Jones v. Mayor of Carrollton

87 S.E. 605, 17 Ga. App. 476, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 709
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1916·No. 6752·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. Grounds of error expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error will not be considered.

2. The ordinance imposing a. business tax upon cotton-buyers in the city of Carrollton was offered in evidence, and sufficiently indicated by its terms that the tax was due and payable “on the first day of October of each and every year” after the adoption thereof.

(a) The fact that the minutes of the city council, setting forth the ordinance in question, were not signed by the mayor or qther officer would not invalidate the ordinance or prevent its taking effect. Moore v. Thomasville, 17 Ga. App. 285 (86 S. E. 641).

2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the judgment rendered by the mayor, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Mayor of Carrollton, 87 S.E. 605, 17 Ga. App. 476, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

87 S.E. 605 (Jones v. Mayor of Carrollton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Warde
118 S.E. 378 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)