Jones v. Mayor of Carrollton
This text of 87 S.E. 605 (Jones v. Mayor of Carrollton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Grounds of error expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error will not be considered.
2. The ordinance imposing a. business tax upon cotton-buyers in the city of Carrollton was offered in evidence, and sufficiently indicated by its terms that the tax was due and payable “on the first day of October of each and every year” after the adoption thereof.
(a) The fact that the minutes of the city council, setting forth the ordinance in question, were not signed by the mayor or qther officer would not invalidate the ordinance or prevent its taking effect. Moore v. Thomasville, 17 Ga. App. 285 (86 S. E. 641).
2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the judgment rendered by the mayor, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 S.E. 605, 17 Ga. App. 476, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-mayor-of-carrollton-gactapp-1916.