Jones v. Mayor

3 N.Y.S. 946, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 983
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedMay 14, 1888
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.Y.S. 946 (Jones v. Mayor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Mayor, 3 N.Y.S. 946, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 983 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that the judge would have been warranted in dismissing the complaint—First, on the ground that there was no certificate; and, [947]*947second, that as to the work additional compensation was claimed for, there was evidence that it was included in the original contract. He did better for the plaintiff than he deserved. He submitted the case to the jury, and we shall not disturb it under this state of facts. We think he received a more favorable consideration‘than he was entitled to upon the evidence. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.Y.S. 946, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-mayor-nyctcompl-1888.