Jones v. Massimo Rizzo, L.L.C.
This text of 109 So. 3d 881 (Jones v. Massimo Rizzo, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In contravention of the well-settled requirement for asserting excusable neglect, Appellant’s motion to set aside the final judgment in this case was unsupported by sworn statements or affidavits. See Chase Home Loans, LLC, v. Sosa, 104 So.3d 1240, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“[A]s we often have said, unsworn representations of counsel about factual matters do not have any evidentiary weight in the absence of a stipulation.”); see also Lederman v. Shore, 707 So.2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (rejecting affidavits not made under oath). For this reason, we affirm.
Affirmed.
FERNANDEZ, J., concurs in result only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 So. 3d 881, 2013 WL 1136445, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-massimo-rizzo-llc-fladistctapp-2013.