Jones v. Massimo Rizzo, L.L.C.

109 So. 3d 881, 2013 WL 1136445, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4444
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 20, 2013
DocketNo. 3D12-495
StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 3d 881 (Jones v. Massimo Rizzo, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Massimo Rizzo, L.L.C., 109 So. 3d 881, 2013 WL 1136445, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4444 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In contravention of the well-settled requirement for asserting excusable neglect, Appellant’s motion to set aside the final judgment in this case was unsupported by sworn statements or affidavits. See Chase Home Loans, LLC, v. Sosa, 104 So.3d 1240, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“[A]s we often have said, unsworn representations of counsel about factual matters do not have any evidentiary weight in the absence of a stipulation.”); see also Lederman v. Shore, 707 So.2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (rejecting affidavits not made under oath). For this reason, we affirm.

Affirmed.

FERNANDEZ, J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lederman v. Shore
707 So. 2d 1134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Chase Home Loans, LLC v. Sosa
104 So. 3d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 So. 3d 881, 2013 WL 1136445, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-massimo-rizzo-llc-fladistctapp-2013.