Jones v. Maryland State's Attorney Office

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Maryland State's Attorney Office

432 F. App'x 262

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2011·No. No. 11-1274·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gil W. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Md. State’s Attorney Office, No. 1:10-cv-03427-BEL (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gil W. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Md. State’s Attorney Office, No. 1:10-cv-03427-BEL (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jones v. Maryland State's Attorney Office, 432 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

432 F. App'x 262 (Jones v. Maryland State's Attorney Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.