Jones v. Martin

16 Cal. 165, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 198
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 16 Cal. 165 (Jones v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Martin, 16 Cal. 165, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 198 (Cal. 1860).

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.

We think the Court erred in excluding the deed in this case. Take the transcript altogether, and we think it shows sufficiently that the seal of the Notary was affixed to the instrument. The certificate asserts [167]*167that the Notary affixed his seal to it, and the words “ No seal,” in brackets in the margin, do not imply that there was no seal affixed, but axe a mere note of the Recorder of the place of the notarial seal, which he had probably no means of copying, nor was it necessary that he should transcribe it.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Connick
209 P. 356 (California Supreme Court, 1922)
Davis v. Seybold
195 F. 402 (Fourth Circuit, 1912)
Strain v. Fitzgerald.
41 S.E. 872 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1902)
Thorn v. Mayer
33 N.Y.S. 664 (Superior Court of New York, 1895)
Thorn v. Mayer
67 N.Y. St. Rep. 389 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1895)
Mitchner v. Holmes
22 S.W. 1070 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
In re Estate of Bedell
3 Coffey 78 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1892)
Todd v. Union Dime Savings Institution
23 N.E. 299 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Putney v. Cutler
11 N.W. 437 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1882)
Geary v. City of Kansas
61 Mo. 378 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1875)
Emmal v. Webb
36 Cal. 197 (California Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cal. 165, 1860 Cal. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-martin-cal-1860.