Jones v. Manning

473 F. App'x 346
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7641
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 346 (Jones v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Manning, 473 F. App'x 346 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Hampton Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Manning, No. 0:11-cv-01093-JMC, 2011 WL 5830167 (D.S.C. filed Nov. 16, 2011 & entered Nov. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-manning-ca4-2012.