Jones v. Mack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jones v. Mack

204 So. 3d 594, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17767

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 2016

DocketNo. 1D16-2974

StatusPublished

This text of 204 So. 3d 594 (Jones v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Mack, 204 So. 3d 594, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal shall be dismissed as premature. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(i). The order appealed merely denied appellant’s motion to accept a May 26, 2016, addendum to: the pending petition for writ of habeas corpus as an amended petition in compliance with the May 27, 2016, “Order Directing Plaintiff/Petitioner to File an Amended Complaint/Petition.” The order is not final because it does not constitute an end to the judicial labor in the cause. Augustin v. Blount, 573 So.2d 104, 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). If appellant is unwilling or unable to file an amended petition, the proper course is to request entry of a final order that may be appealed. Id.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., ’ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal shall be dismissed as premature. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(i). The order appealed merely denied appellant’s motion to accept a May 26, 2016, addendum to: the pending petition for writ of habeas corpus as an amended petition in compliance with the May 27, 2016, “Order Directing Plaintiff/Petitioner to File an Amended Complaint/Petition.” The order is not final because it does not constitute an end to the judicial labor in the cause. Augustin v. Blount, 573 So.2d 104, 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). If appellant is unwilling or unable to file an amended petition, the proper course is to request entry of a final order that may be appealed. Id.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., ’ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 So. 3d 594, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-mack-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack