Jones v. Lucas
This text of 1 Va. 268 (Jones v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[269]*269January 21.
delivered the opinion of the court.
The court is of opinion, that the objections taken in the bill of exceptions, to the deposition referred to, came too late. Although the questions were leading questions, calculated to inform the witness of the answers expected by the party propounding them, and therefore improper j yet, after the jury were sworn, it would have been irregular to suppress the deposition, there being no objection to the competency of the witness. Before the jury were sworn, on motion, the questions and answers objected to ought to have been suppressed by the court. Afterwards, and upon the trial, the objections could only go to the credit of the witness. The judgment is, therefore, to be affirmed.
Judge Cabell absent
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Va. 268, 1 Rand. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-lucas-va-1823.