Jones v. Lucas

Indiana Court of Appeals

Jones v. Lucas

128 N.E. 696, 74 Ind. App. 231, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 228

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1920·No. No. 10,643·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The brief filed by appellants in this case is insufficient to present any question for our consideration. The only error relied upon is the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial. The brief wholly fails to set out said motion or the substance thereof. On the' authority of Pugh, Admr., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1916), 184 Ind. 350, 110 N. E. 193, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The brief filed by appellants in this case is insufficient to present any question for our consideration. The only error relied upon is the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial. The brief wholly fails to set out said motion or the substance thereof. On the' authority of Pugh, Admr., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1916), 184 Ind. 350, 110 N. E. 193, the judgment is affirmed.

Jones v. Lucas, 128 N.E. 696, 74 Ind. App. 231, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 228 (Ind. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

128 N.E. 696 (Jones v. Lucas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related