Jones v. Lucas
128 N.E. 696, 74 Ind. App. 231, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 228
This text of 128 N.E. 696 (Jones v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. Lucas, 128 N.E. 696, 74 Ind. App. 231, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 228 (Ind. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
The brief filed by appellants in this case is insufficient to present any question for our consideration. The only error relied upon is the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial. The brief wholly fails to set out said motion or the substance thereof. On the' authority of Pugh, Admr., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1916), 184 Ind. 350, 110 N. E. 193, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pugh v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
110 N.E. 193 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
128 N.E. 696, 74 Ind. App. 231, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-lucas-indctapp-1920.