Jones v. Lore

3 N.J.L. 1049
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1813·Published

Opinion

By the Coubt. — This

is a plain act of wrong and injustice. The plaintiff should have brought his action against Steward and wife. They occupied the [*] meadow and took the profits of it, and were for the time the owners, and ought to have paid the repairs. Besides, [764] if one of the daughters were liable, the other was also; and the action should have been joint against both.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Lore, 3 N.J.L. 1049 (N.J. 1813).

3 N.J.L. 1049 (Jones v. Lore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.