Jones v. Lore
3 N.J.L. 1049
Opinion
is a plain act of wrong and injustice. The plaintiff should have brought his action against Steward and wife. They occupied the [*] meadow and took the profits of it, and were for the time the owners, and ought to have paid the repairs. Besides, [764] if one of the daughters were liable, the other was also; and the action should have been joint against both.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Lore, 3 N.J.L. 1049 (N.J. 1813).
3 N.J.L. 1049 (Jones v. Lore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.