Jones v. L'Ecluse
This text of 134 A.D. 928 (Jones v. L'Ecluse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order sets aside a verdict for the alleged misconduct of a juror. In a brief opinion the learned Special Term finds ho irregularity in the conduct of the j uryman, and also finds the conduct of the counsel and the witness involved to have been blameless, but holds that “ the influence of just such happenings is so subtle that it is most difficult to weigh its effect." We think a judgment should not be destroyed unless the alien influence is manifest, and, therefore, reverse the order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and reinstate the verdict. Hirschberg, P. J., Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Burr and Miller, JJ., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D. 928, 118 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-lecluse-nyappdiv-1909.