Jones v. Krathwohl-Hood

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jones v. Krathwohl-Hood

967 So. 2d 258, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14397, 2007 WL 2682040

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 2007·No. No. 1D07-3209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Appellants’ response to the Court’s order of July 23, 2007, the court has determined that the order on appeal is not final. Specifically, the Amended Final Summary Judgment’s reservation of jurisdiction over the issue of treble damages to be awarded under Count II for civil theft demonstrates that the lower tribunal’s judicial labor is incomplete. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

BROWNING, C.J., PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Appellants’ response to the Court’s order of July 23, 2007, the court has determined that the order on appeal is not final. Specifically, the Amended Final Summary Judgment’s reservation of jurisdiction over the issue of treble damages to be awarded under Count II for civil theft demonstrates that the lower tribunal’s judicial labor is incomplete. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

BROWNING, C.J., PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Jones v. Krathwohl-Hood, 967 So. 2d 258, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14397, 2007 WL 2682040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

967 So. 2d 258 (Jones v. Krathwohl-Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related