Jones v. Knotts
70 So. 701, 110 Miss. 590
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in the court below proved a good cause of action by the testimony he offered, and, as there was a conflict in the evidence offered by the plaintiff and the defendants below, the cause should have gone to the jury, and the trial judge erred in granting a peremptory instruction for the appellees.
Therefore the case is reversed.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Knotts, 70 So. 701, 110 Miss. 590 (Mich. 1915).
70 So. 701 (Jones v. Knotts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.