Jones v. Klachkin

13 A.D.2d 911, 217 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10380

This text of 13 A.D.2d 911 (Jones v. Klachkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Klachkin, 13 A.D.2d 911, 217 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Order entered' on February 5, 1960, granting defendant-respondent, Joseph Blau’s motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and [912]*912disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Order entered on February 5, 1960, granting defendant-respondent, Max R. Klaehkin’s motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur—Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.2d 911, 217 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-klachkin-nyappdiv-1961.