Jones v. Kelly

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jones v. Kelly

273 So. 2d 140

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 19, 1973

DocketNo. 72-287

StatusPublished

This text of 273 So. 2d 140 (Jones v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Kelly, 273 So. 2d 140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment based upon a jury verdict for the defendant in a negligence action. Essentially, appellant contends that a new trial should have been granted because the jury was confused in the application of the trial judge’s instructions on the law to the facts of the case. Our review of the record before us convinces us that the limited record presented is not sufficient to demonstrate error. See Cleeland v. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 260. All other points have been reviewed and do not constitute reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment based upon a jury verdict for the defendant in a negligence action. Essentially, appellant contends that a new trial should have been granted because the jury was confused in the application of the trial judge’s instructions on the law to the facts of the case. Our review of the record before us convinces us that the limited record presented is not sufficient to demonstrate error. See Cleeland v. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 260. All other points have been reviewed and do not constitute reversible error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 So. 2d 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-kelly-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack