Jones v. Jones

4 Va. 447
Virginia Chancery Court·Decided June 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

By the Chancellor.

As to the first question, the general rule of law is this, that where you take an account of one of the parties as evidence against him, you must admit it to be evidence for him : but this is only so far as the account itself would be evidence if it were proved by other means. For example, the account should not be evidence, so far as any error should be apparent on its face.

As to the second question: if the defendant had brought this suit, the judgment at law against him would be a clear bar; but as the suit is brought against him by his adversary, at law, the judgment is no bar.

Decree for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Jones, 4 Va. 447 (Va. Super. Ct. 1809).

4 Va. 447 (Jones v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Houston
2015 UT 40 (Utah Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Sieyes
225 P.3d 995 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
District of Columbia v. Heller
554 U.S. 570 (Supreme Court, 2008)
Harmelin v. Michigan
501 U.S. 957 (Supreme Court, 1991)